On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 10:10:36PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > In the win98--3.0.22 network I have observed that smbd takes a lot of > %system CPU time when transferring files. Since I observe this slowness > on three different setups, the question arises: is SMB/CIFS badly > designed?
Well, is it "designed" at all in any proper definition of "design"? Seriously, smbd should not eat significant amounts of CPU on a reasonably modern machine. Do you have your debug level set too high? Volker -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
