On Monday 05 February 2007 11:05, Papo Napolitano wrote: > Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote: > > On 02/02/2007 01:08 PM, Papo Napolitano wrote: > >> Any one still having problems with "valid users" on 3.0.23d? > >> I'm working in "security = USER" mode and with local users only. > >> > >> Share configuration : > >> > >> [private] > >> path = /home/private > >> valid users = papo > >> force user = root > >> force group = root > >> read only = No > >> create mask = 0600 > >> directory mask = 0700 > > > > [...] > > > >> Second test, using a valid but not listed user : > >> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# smbclient //julieta/private -U administrator > >> Password: > >> Domain=[JULIETA] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.23d] > >> smb: \> mkdir 1 > >> smb: \> rmdir 1 > >> smb: \> quit > >> > >> This is wrong, administrator shouldn't write, not even connect > >> to the share. "invalid users" seems to work ok though. > >> I can provide debug logs for both versions if needed. > >> Any hints? > > > > Is your administrator in the list of 'admin users'? > > > >> Thanks.- > > > > Kind regards, > > No, 'admin users' is empty. > Anyway, I'm observing the same behaviour with any account. > Downgrading to 3.0.22 and using the same smb.conf works, I'm going to > try 3.0.24 in the next couple of days just to be sure. > > Thanks.-
Please read the WHATSNEW.txt file that ships with Samba-3.0.x. You'll see that the semantics of "valid users" was changed around 3.0.8. - John T. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba