-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tiucra-Popa Florin Catalin wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > In other words another cheap answer like: we can't afford > to document how you can do it becasue we are too busy > to develop new candidates.
You cannot really say that. I just finished rewriting over half of a book to update documentation: http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba3/index.html So I went back and looked at your previous post: >[2007/05/02 15:19:47, 0] smbd/server.c:main(835) > standard input is not a socket, assuming -D option >[2007/05/02 15:19:47, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(708) > bind failed on port 139 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0. > Error = Address already in use I guess I would expect someone trying to configure a server to have enough networking knowledge to realize that another daemon is already bound to port 139. Now you can read the "smb ports" option in smb.conf(5) to change the default ports (generally not a good idea) or you can run `lsof -n -i tcp` to see what is listening on port 139. But to be fair, I went and dug up your original post here: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2007-April/131409.html The smb.conf excerpt: valid users = @"domain users", clearly shows that you did not read the release notes either. Unqualified domain names in smb.conf have not been recommended nor supported since Samba 3.08. In Samba 3.0.23 this became a hard requirement. So please, before you start whining, at least read the documentation provided. If you don't want to do that, at least please stop trolling this list. Thanks. cheers, jerry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGPlKgIR7qMdg1EfYRAtHbAJ0Z9KemGifeQXh0OvE6ANxARwJEcwCfUpHR /s8pipzOBiNcvIrhHor933E= =/iGv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba