Okay, I agree then. There are a set of standard ways of representing a user name on a domain. There is 'NT\username', there is '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. And there is 'username'.
Is it so bad to think that [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be desired? I desire it because I have non-Windows related things that use plain Kerberos realms, and they use this form. And I like it. There is no short NT4 style name in these circumstances. Perhaps then just a single option for the single canonical version? "unix", "nt", "realm". winbind canonical form = realm All look ups of all forms would be mapped to this single representation. That way users could login using any. On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 19:46 +0000, simo wrote: > > madness slip in again. Not unless it is really really necessary. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
