On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 12:51:24AM +0100, Markus Neis wrote: > Ok I understand. People that earn more money than me made > this decision ;-) But I wonder why Redhat offers the > possibility in their cluster suite to setup samba services > on top of gfs. This should be a known problem then. > However, as I understand you its not a good idea to use > samba with gfs unless we would use ctdb?
You can perfectly fine use samba on top of gfs, as long as you only share your data from a single node or (more precisely) make sure that every directory is only shared via a single node. Different directories can be shared via different nodes. Volker
pgpUEn6ruvE1v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
