Hi guys, At 11:57 4-11-2002 -0600, you wrote:
Personally I wouldn't touch XP.. Of course thats just me so to keep the conversation honest.. I think if you are looking at using XP as a file server then you probably are going to fall short just like any other workstation.. (Limit 10). In addition the thread handling of a
Danny
On 04/Nov/2002 08:40:37, James Wright wrote:
> Just think ahead and watch your security. It will pick up every share it can find and workgroups and subnets won't contain it; so a traditional network we've done for years no longer applies without additional routing and rules. I've had to re-wire more than one network once XP got plugged in.
----- Original Message -----I had and still have problems understanding with XP en XP-pro
From: Rodney Richison
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 8:07 AM
Subject: [sambar] new machines {01}
I am working up some machines for a customer and will hopefully talk them into sambar later. Are there issues with XP Professional that I should consider before I built the file server?
Highest Regards,
Rodney
and I had problems and still have problems understanding
Sambar server (after years still dont understand the config completely :=). But those problems were never related as to the one causing
problems for the other. In fact I have installed Sambar on Win95, Win98,
Win2000, WinNT, Win-XP, Win-XP-pro, they are all running smoothly.
I would not know what was better, unless I'm not demanding enough
of the server, to see where and which operating system is
giving up.
My two EURO-cents :),
Henk Schrik
tel. (31)(0)6 53612294
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website: http://henk.schrik.org
or http://henk.schrik.nl
-------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe please go to http://www.sambar.ch/list/
