Pls see why: Fri 2003-04-25 16:33:53: [576:1434] --> 250 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sender ok Fri 2003-04-25 16:33:53: [576:1434] <-- RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri 2003-04-25 16:33:53: [576:1434] --> 250 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Recipient ok Fri 2003-04-25 16:33:53: [576:1434] <-- DATA Fri 2003-04-25 16:33:53: [576:1434] --> 354 Enter mail, end with <CRLF>.<CRLF> Fri 2003-04-25 16:33:53: [576:1434] IP 80.134.59.172 parsed from 'Received' header 1 Fri 2003-04-25 16:33:53: [576:1434] Spam Blocker A-record resolution of [172.59.134.80.relays.visi.com] in progress (DNS Server: 192.168.192.6)... Fri 2003-04-25 16:33:53: [576:1434] Spam Blocker A-record resolution of [172.59.134.80.sbl.spamhaus.org] in progress (DNS Server: 192.168.192.6)... Fri 2003-04-25 16:33:53: [576:1434] Spam Blocker A-record resolution of [172.59.134.80.rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org] in progress (DNS Server: 192.168.192.6)... Fri 2003-04-25 16:33:53: [576:1434] Spam Blocker D=172.59.134.80.rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org TTL=(15) A=[127.1.0.2] Fri 2003-04-25 16:33:53: [576:1434] Mail from 80.134.59.172 refused by RBL+ Fri 2003-04-25 16:33:53: [576:1434] --> 554 Message contains known spam source in Received: header Fri 2003-04-25 16:33:53: [576:1434] <-- QUIT Fri 2003-04-25 16:33:53: [576:1434] --> 221Goodbye Fri 2003-04-25 16:33:53: [576:1434] SMTP session successful, 4563 bytes transferred. Fri 2003-04-25 16:33:53: ---------- Fri 2003-04-25 16:33:53: Mail from 80.134.59.172 refused by RBL+ ---------------------
..and before everybody starts yelling at me: http://www.sambar.ch/list.stm?function=policy&show=guidelines Alex At 17:12 25.04.2003 Michael Penzkofer wrote: > I just entered my answer to the helping people for my SMTP-problem, > finished and clicked "send"... That's, what I got back: > (remember: thats my "normal" ISP-account of T-Online and I don't do > spamming!!) > > This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim). > > A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its > recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > SMTP error from remote mailer after end of data: > host inet.alexb.ch [62.2.214.115]: 554 Message contains known spam > source in Received: > header > > ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------ > > Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Received: from fwd00.sul.t-online.de > by mailout10.sul.t-online.com with smtp > id 1994gm-0005SY-00; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:00:36 +0200 > Received: from t-online.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by > fwd00.sul.t-online.com > with esmtp id 1994gQ-1dLca8C; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:00:14 +0200 > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:00:08 +0200 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Penzkofer) > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-DE; rv:1.0.1) > Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 > X-Accept-Language: de-de, de > MIME-Version: 1.0 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [sambar] problems with SMTP-Server... {01} > References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Peter schrieb: > I was thinking maybe his IP was listed on the DUL (dialup user > list)list. > Many ISPs now register their IP blocks that belong to dialup users so > they can't run mail servers. More info can be found here http://www.mail- > abuse.org/dul/ > > > > Definitely no! Of course T-Online's IPs are listed at several > blacklists, but I never found anyone else than T-Online's MX to reject > my mails coming from Sambar-MX. They simply don't accept the login. > > > Danny wrote: > > ok.. so it sounds like t-online is doing reverse dns lookup and > confirming that your reverse does not match what your mail server is > presenting itself as. You mentioned you are using dynamic DNS services. > Have you configured a MX record for your dynamic address. Also your > mail server should present itself to t-online as the dynamic > address(ie; mail.ini FQDN). This may be hopeless if they are reversing > your IP address. > > Yes, I've tried. But they nevertheless accept. > > > > Dynamic addresses are mostly pains to perform true mail functions > especially for those recipient mail servers that are performing reverse > DNS lookup. You might consider changing your server from a mail MTA to > a relayer through your ISP. I know we had to do this for a customer > that was using dialup MSN because MSN started blocking all outbound > port 25 unless it was coming from their server.. ie; we had to turn MTA > = False and configure the mail server to relay all mail via the MSN > SMTP server. By doing this, Sambar will no longer lookup or deliver any > messages itself but will rather use your ISP email account dump them > all on the responsibility of your ISP's SMTP server for delivery. If > your ISP requires AUTH for using this account, you will find the relay > AUTH settings in mail.ini as well. > > Hope this helps, > Danny > > > Not really, sorry. > Reason is: if I'm using T-Online as my ISP I'm forced to use the > "regular" mailserver mailto.t-online.de. But this one prints outgoing > mail with my name and my X-Sender (take a look to this mail!). They > override any other FROM-Lines. > You have only the choice to pay some more bucks to be able to use theire > "smtprelay.t-online.de", which has been for free for long years... ;-( > No good idea if you're planning to run a mailing-list with a > Sambar-server and every message will be printed with your own name.... > instead of the real sender! > Sambar did the job very nice, the only negative is the missing > acceptance of Sambar-generated mails which are adressed TO (!) accounts > ending with "@t-online.de" ... > Setting up an MXHOST-file for sambar will also do fine: all mails are > served by Sambar except those ones directed to an "t-online.de"-account > (should be the same for "t-online.net", "t-online.at" and some more of > T-Online....). Those ones I'd like to pass through another relay, but > this one requires AUTH when logging on to the MX there. > And exactly for that reason I'm looking for a method to do an AUTHORIZED > LOGIN at a far MX by Sambars MX byself! > > Sorry for the long delay in answering, but I've to do my normal job just > beside... ;-) > > Hopefully someone (Todd ???!) has an idea.... > > BTW: I meanwhile also upgraded to the newest 6.0-version of Sambar, > hoping to find there some more possibilities for that specific usement. > But: I've better haven't done! Now I'm just learning to find my way > through the new memus.... ;-) > Since starting with Sambar elsewhere at 4.x I've learned: every new > version-number brings up a very new feeling at the frontend ;-)))) > > But anyway: Thanks to Todd for his really great work! > > Michael > ------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe please go to http://www.sambar.ch/list/ > ------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe please go to http://www.sambar.ch/list/ ------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe please go to http://www.sambar.ch/list/
