I think Sambar has a lot to add. Not to say that Sambar is better than Apache nor Apache is better than Sambar. Here would be my list.
1) Familiar product with what we have been using on win32. 2) Already built in session cookie management. 3) Mail 4) Webmail 5) Document Manager 6) Sambar and C-Scripting 7) Built in DBMS. 8) Nice following ensuring quick fixes and improvements. Sambar has come a long way and mostly because of the community supporting it. Apache appears to be more commercialized and I doubt you would get many direct emails from the Author. Of course you can probably accomplish anything in Apache but with Sambar you get a nice package and a friendly community, Most of the time :) Danny On 21/Jun/2003 17:08:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Just like to get a little feed back. I am currently using Omni HTTPD, > but I have my doubts about it's longevity. Why Sambar over Apache? I > have played with both and both performed well. > > TIA > Roger > > ------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe please go to http://www.sambar.ch/list/ > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe please go to http://www.sambar.ch/list/
