Great to here this. A RM C implementation will be able to give the reliability QOS while keeping the performance at a very high level.
I am +1 for changing the SVN locations as you have suggested.
Chamikara
On 6/13/06, Sahan Gamage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
I am planning to implement a Sandesha2 module for the axis2c. My
intention is to follow the same architecture used in Sandesha2/Java.
By this time I have implemented some of the functionality and hence,
we need to decide where the code is going reside in the svn. My
personal view is we should put this code inside the Sandesha2 trunk.
For this it is required to split the current svn as java and c.
So shall we split the current svn as
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/sandesha/trunk/java - for
the existing Sandesha2 Java impl.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/sandesha/trunk/c - for
the c implementation of Sandesha2 architecture.
Thanks
- Sahan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
