Hi Tijs,
I don't think SOAP session support is a requirement that can be expected
from RM.
Sandesha's task ends at the QoS level and what you need is application
sessions.
The best approach you can use is to write your own message receiver which
handle IN, IN... IN OUT message exchange pattern.
So this receiver simply will not send a respones at each input message
rather will send it at the desired point.
Thanks,
-Jaliya
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: Re: [Sandesha2] InOrder assurance
Hi Chamikara,
Thanks for the information.
What I would like is soapsession support, but that seems not to be working
with Reliable Messaging.
The soapsession could then last for the whole sequence.
Is it possible to have a combination of Sequence and soapsession support?
Thanks,
Tijs
van: "Chamikara Jayalath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
datum: 2006/10/01 Sun AM 08:11:28 MEST
aan: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: [email protected]
onderwerp: Re: [Sandesha2] InOrder assurance
Hi Tijs,
The lifetime of the service instance depends on ur service scope. The
default scope is 'Request scope' causing a service instance to be created
per each request. In your case the service scope hs to be changed to
'application' causing a single service instance to be present for the
whole
lifetime of the Axis2 system.
To change the scope edit your services.xml file as follows.
<service name="Service1" scope="application">
</service>
More info. can be found in following article by Deepal,
http://www.developer.com/services/article.php/3620661
Chamikara
On 10/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I have a question/remark about the working of the InOrder QOS for
> Sandesha2. I am working on a scenario where I want to sent multiple
> message
> in one sequence with the InOrder QOS enabled. This is working, but what
> I am
> missing currently is that I would like the same instance of the service
> being called for the whole sequence. I need this because the messages
> send
> in the sequence at the end of the sequence have to be consolidated in a
> single response based on the content of all the messages in the
> sequence.
> I found that currently the messages in the sequence are processed
> individually by seperate service instances.
> What do you think of this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tijs
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
