Just an idea; Do we need "RM" prefix in the classes? IMHO they are already in sandesha packages so putting "RM" prefix is not necessary. How about SequenceBean and MessageBean.
Thanks, -Jaliya ----- Original Message ----- From: Chamikara Jayalath To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 12:25 PM Subject: [Sandesha2] Ranaming of the Bean and BeanManager classes Hi All, I think its better to rename following StorageManager classes. The new names map better to the task done by them. CreateSequenceBean -> RMSBean - Contains data of the sequences for which the current Sandesha2 instance works as a RMS NextMsgBean -> RMDBean - Contains data of the sequences for which the current Sandesha2 instance works as a RMD Following two Bean Managers should also be renamed. CreateSequenceBeanMgr -> RMSBeanMgr NextMsgBeanMgr -> RMDBeanMgr Comments? Chamikara
