Amila, You asked: > So do you mind starting the Mercury as another wscommons project and proceed? > In this way > we may have a similar comparison at about 6 months time and see whether what > we can do to > make a much better RM implementation.
And my answer is yes. I'm also not keen on starting a new branch in Sandehsa which implies that it's the next version. If we're going to have a branch, i really wouldn't want it pre-implied that it will replace Sandesha2 at some point. Why? Because, as I've already said, I have some pretty serious concerns about the current design of Mercury, so I'd really object to starting 'version 3' based on it, especially since I doubt I'll have any time to participate in it over the next few months, making it more likely it'll diverge from how I'd like to see the next generation of Sandesha. Hence the 'rules for revolutionaries' appear to make some sense. Dims, I assume you've seen them succeed in the past? >From the 'rules', I assume it would also mean that there wouldn't be any Apache sanctioned releases of Mercury unless we decide to to merge this 'branch' and the trunk... just something more to think about. David -- David Illsley - IBM Web Services Development --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
