On 07/22/22 09:30, Ralph Little wrote:
Hi,
On 2022-07-22 08:56, Ralph Little wrote:
Hi,
On 2022-07-21 12:19, r. a. schmied wrote:
saners
the missing '/' on line ending umax
(see rcsdiff -uBitwb configure.ac below)
might be why the umax_pp always
builds even with an envvar like
export BACKENDS='genesys net test'
passed to configure.
yet to determine 1) why the backends
umax1220u v4l xerox_mfp p5
*do not get* built along with umax_pp and
2) if the added '/' will have any actual effect.
i doubt this will have desired effect, as the
Makefile(s) do have 'BACKENDS = genesys net test'
and do not have umax_pp (or any other backend)
in any obviously related envvar/macro.
same missing '/' and build situation exists for
sane-backends-1.0.32.86-911be
and
sane-backends-1.0.28
ras
--- configure.ac 2022/07/21 17:45:34 1.1
+++ configure.ac 2022/07/21 17:45:51
@@ -671,7 +671,7 @@
mustek_usb mustek_usb2 nec net niash pie pieusb pint \
pixma plustek plustek_pp qcam ricoh ricoh2 rts8891 s9036 \
sceptre sharp sm3600 sm3840 snapscan sp15c st400 \
- stv680 tamarack teco1 teco2 teco3 test u12 umax
+ stv680 tamarack teco1 teco2 teco3 test u12 umax \
umax_pp umax1220u v4l xerox_mfp p5"
# If user specifies backends manually then cause configure
OK, I looked into this a little bit.
The issue is actually caused by the tools/ directory which builds a
tool called umax_pp.
This tool has a dependency on umax_pp_low which is why, despite the
umax_pp backend being disabled, the umax_pp_low.c source is built.
There doesn't appear to be a configured way to disable this being
built so I will add something.
Thanks for raising this issue.
Cheers,
Ralph
OK, more detail on this.
The umax_pp tool in the tools directory is always built. However, if you
disable the umax_pp backend then it merely sets the umax_pp tool to not
install, yet it is still built.
I think it is fair to say that if you are disabling the umax_pp backend,
then you are likely not interested in the umax_pp tool so I have removed
the build/noinstall option.
I have added a check-in that if you disable the umax_pp backend, the
tool is not built.
Cheers,
Ralph
aloha ralph and interested saners
ralph your analysis from a black-box view looks correct.
i've got sane-backends-1.0.27 installed and tools/umax_pp
was not installed, but tools/umax_pp was compiled and linked.
for both sane-backends-1.0.28 and sane-backends-1.0.32.86-911be
tools/umax_pp was compiled and linked. neither of these versions
have been installed yet [well 1.0.32.86-911be does not work, and
while 1.0.28 is better than 1.0.27 i keep messing with 1.0.28
to see if i can get it 'better' or at least more to my liking.
[ backend issues with lide 200 and the contrast and brightness settings
and frontend issues [scanimage] with options and arguments that
as a gray-beard command liner (and horrible typist) drive me crazy ]
is the 'check-in' patch simple enough for an email transmittal?
not critical, now that i understand the reason i can stop wondering
why.
ras
