--- Jim George <jg014a8...@blueyonder.co.uk> a
écrit : > Jochen,
> 
> here's the output from SANE_DEBUG_MUSTEK_PP=128
> scanimage -T
> 
> [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of mustek_pp to
> 128.
> [mustek_pp] init: SANE v1.0.5, backend v1.0.9-devel
> [mustek_pp] I wouldn't let myself be root if I were
> you...

- you should assume an upgrade to SANE 1.0.6,
or your installation is broken/an old insatll is in
your $PATH
> [mustek_pp] init: option io-mode 2
> [mustek_pp] init: option niceload
> [mustek_pp] init: trying port `0x378'
> [mustek_pp] attach: couldn't attach to `0x378'
> (Invalid argument)
> [mustek_pp] attach(v1.0.9-devel): line 435: debug
> exception
> [mustek_pp] init: couldn't attach to port `0x378'
> [mustek_pp] init: 'name' only allowed after 'port'
> [mustek_pp] init: 'vendor' only allowed after 'port'
> [mustek_pp] init: option cis1200 isn't a global
> option
> [mustek_pp] init: option strip-height 16
> [mustek_pp] init: setting global option strip-height
> to 16
> [mustek_pp] init: option buffer 122400
> [mustek_pp] init: setting global option buffer to
> 122400
> scanimage: scanning image of size 5120x7000 pixels
> at 24 bits/pixel
> scanimage: acquiring RGB frame, 8 bits/sample
> scanimage: reading one scanline, 15360 bytes...       PASS
> scanimage: reading one byte...                PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 2 bytes...   PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 4 bytes...   PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 8 bytes...   PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 16 bytes...  PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 32 bytes...  PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 64 bytes...  PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 128 bytes...         PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 256 bytes...         PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 512 bytes...         PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 1024 bytes...        PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 2048 bytes...        PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 4096 bytes...        PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 8192 bytes...        PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 16384 bytes...       PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 16383 bytes...       PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 8191 bytes...        PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 4095 bytes...        PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 2047 bytes...        PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 1023 bytes...        PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 511 bytes...         PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 255 bytes...         PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 127 bytes...         PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 63 bytes...  PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 31 bytes...  PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 15 bytes...  PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 7 bytes...   PASS
> scanimage: stepped read, 3 bytes...   PASS
> [mustek_pp] exit: (...)
> 
> also I got the following errors on my console when I
> ran the command
> (please note I have no TV capture card).
> 
> Nov 16 22:38:30 linux kernel: Linux video capture
> interface: v1.00
> Nov 16 22:38:30 linux kernel: i2c-core.o: i2c core
> module
> Nov 16 22:38:30 linux kernel: i2c-algo-bit.o: i2c
> bit algorithm module
> Nov 16 22:38:30 linux kernel: bttv: driver version
> 0.7.35 loaded
> Nov 16 22:38:30 linux kernel: bttv: using 2 buffers
> with 2080k (4160k total) for capture
> Nov 16 22:38:30 linux insmod:
> /lib/modules/2.2.18/misc/bttv.o: init_module: Device
> or resource busy
> Nov 16 22:38:30 linux insmod: Hint: insmod errors
> can be caused by incorrect module parameters,
> including invalid IO or IRQ parameters
> Nov 16 22:38:30 linux insmod:
> /lib/modules/2.2.18/misc/bttv.o: insmod
> char-major-81 failed
> 
> TIA for any help you can offer.
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> On Fri, 2001-11-16 at 16:44, Jochen Eisinger wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > Does this also happen with plain scanimage on your
> scanner server (as root)?
> > 
> > Could you put somewhere on he internet such a
> scanned image and the
> > output of
> > 
> > SANE_DEBUG_MUSTEK_PP=128 scanimage -T
> > 
> > (assuming you're using bash)
> > 
> > regards
> > - -- jochen
> > 
> > Jim George wrote:
> > 
> > | Folks,
> > |
> > | I'm not sure what to think.
> > |
> > | I've got my Mustek_PP 1200CP working on all my
> Linux clients to my Linux
> > | Server.......Good News or what?
> > | I've got my Mustek_PP 1200CP working from my
> Windows client (using
> > | Xsane-WIN32) to my Linux Server....Better News
> or what?
> > | The problem is that all instances of scanning
> miss the last 1/4 of the
> > | vertical page.  No matter what I do or where I
> position the damn paper I
> > | miss the rightmost 1/4 of the page.....Bad News
> or what?
> > |
> > |
> > | Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong?
> > |
> > | TIA,
> > |
> > | Jim
> > |
> > | p.s. I realise having written this letter that
> it looks somewhat
> > | big-headed to claim 'I've got my...', when in
> fact it was you guys who
> > | wrote the software.
> > |
> > |
> > |
> > |
> > | _______________________________________________
> > | Sane-devel mailing list
> > | sane-de...@www.mostang.com
> > |
> http://www.mostang.com/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
> > |
> > 
> > 
> > - --
> > ~  "I'd rather die before using Micro$oft Word"
> > ~    -- Donald E. Knuth
> > ~     (asked whether he'd reinvent TeX in the
> light of M$ Word)
> > ~
> > ~  GnuGP public key for jochen.eisin...@gmx.de:
> > ~     
> http://home.nexgo.de/jochen.eisinger/pubkey.asc
> (0x8AEB7AE3)
> > 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
> > 
> >
>
iD8DBQE79UJU8OF76YrreuMRAkSPAJ0QaYi8WGL6k0M0oh80/p1wbbNdvwCgvl5t
> > CD7sz/gkcnQsc+eHsfUqONs=
> > =9Syh
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sane-devel mailing list
> > sane-de...@www.mostang.com
> > http://www.mostang.com/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sane-devel mailing list
> sane-de...@www.mostang.com
> http://www.mostang.com/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel 

___________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
Yahoo! Courrier : http://courrier.yahoo.fr

Reply via email to