Hi, thanks for your answer,
It's right, the name of the scanner is LEO LEOScan-S3. Here are the output of "SANE_DEBUG_LEO=255 scanimage -L": [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of leo to 255. [leo] sane_init [leo] This is sane-leo version 1.0-9 [leo] (C) 2002 by Frank Zago [leo] attach_scanner: /dev/sg0 [leo] leo_init: enter [leo] leo_init: exit [leo] attach_scanner: opening /dev/sg0 [leo] leo_identify_scanner: enter [leo] device is "LEO" "LEOScan-S3" "1.10" [leo] leo_identify_scanner: exit, device not supported [leo] ERROR: attach_scanner: scanner-identification failed [leo] leo_free: enter [leo] leo_close: enter [leo] leo_close: exit [leo] leo_free: exit [leo] sane_init: leave [leo] sane_get_devices: enter [leo] sane_get_devices: exit No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something different, check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and detected by the sane-find-scanner tool (if appropriate). Please read the documentation which came with this software (README, FAQ, manpages). [leo] sane_exit: enter [leo] sane_exit: exit In the dll.conf I only uncomment the line with "leo". When this is not a failure of sane, then it could only a problem with the SCSI cable. Bye Axel Henning Meier-Geinitz schrieb: >Hi, > >On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 10:56:40PM +0100, axel dammers wrote: > > >>I am trying to make my old SCSI scanner Leo S3 work. >> >>"sane-find-scanner" (as root) say's: >> found SCSI scanner 2LEO LEOScan-S3 1.10" at /dev/scanner >> found SCSI scanner 2LEO LEOScan-S3 1.10" at /dev/sg0 >> >> > >Shouldn't this be a " instead of the 2? > > > >>"scanimage -d leo:/dev/scanner" or "scanimage -d leo:/dev/sg0" say's >>(as root): >> scanimage: open of device leo failed: Invalid argument >> >> > >Use "SANE_DEBUG_LEO=255 scanimage -L" to get debug output. > > > >>I am using sane-1.0.9-1 with SuSE8.1. This sane-Version should >>supports the scanner. >> >>Permissions on /dev/sg0: 640 >>Link: /dev/scanner -> /dev/sg0 >> >>The contents of /etc/sane.d/leo.conf: >> scsi ACROSS * Scanner * * * 0 >> /dev/sg0 >> >> > >The Leo backend seems to expect the vendor id "ACCROSS" and no "LEO". >However in the source code, LEO is also detected, so it should work >with the second line. > > > >>Why does scanimage not recognize my scanner and why can't I scan ? >> >> > >If you can't find out by looking at the debug log, post it here. > > > >>By the way, yast2 from SuSE-Linux don't know the LEO S3, only the >>LEO FS-1130. >> >> > >Tell SuSE about that :-) > >leo is listed in dll.conf? > >Bye, > Henning >_______________________________________________ >Sane-devel mailing list >sane-de...@www.mostang.com >http://www.mostang.com/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel > > >