"Franz Bakan" <fba...@gmx.net> wrote: >>That means : >>-in_addr_t mask; >>+u_int32_t mask; /* or similar, depending on what kind of integers >> you've got on OS/2 */ > > Yes, this works. > >>I'll commit that to CVS in a moment. > > I see the entry in changelog, but line 611 still has in_addr_t > > Could you please commit again?
Yes, sorry, there are 2 implementations of check_v4_in_range() and I forgot about the second one :-) Fixed. JB. -- Julien BLACHE <http://www.jblache.org> <j...@jblache.org>