On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:18:39AM -0500, Howard Shane wrote:
> I would like to announce the completion of the initial draft of the 
> Scanner-HOWTO for the linux documentation project, and invite 
> participants on the SANE-devel mailing list to comment on it.
> 
> The goal of this document is to bridge point A (scanner) to point B 
> (scanner running successfully in linux) for the relative newbie as 
> efficiently as possible. As such it should not be too technical, it 
> should cover the most common hardware interface types, the required 
> steps to reach a working result, likely pitfalls and how to recover from 
> them, and places to go for help. It is not designed to be an exaustive 
> list of harware in/compatibilities.
> 
> Any help you can suggest to clarify or otherwise improve the draft will 
> be greatly appreciated and may even result in you being mentioned in the 
> credits if you so desire.
> 
> The document can be found at:
> 
> http://ibiblio.org/gferg/ldp/Scanner-HOWTO.html
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sane-devel mailing list
> sane-de...@www.mostang.com
> http://www.mostang.com/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel

        Hello,

        I've parsed it a bit, and I must say that you're painting the picture 
darker than it
really is for parallel port scanners. Parallel port scanners listed in SANE do 
work. No need to
frighten people.

        I'm a bit skeptic about favouring ECP mode. It may be wise for 
printers, but I think
it is useless for scanners, unless you use some patch that bring DMA reads. 
From a quick grep
in SANE docs, EPP or ECP/EPP seems to be the recommended setting.
        
        By the way, an EPP scan is way faster than PS/2 or bidirectional mode. 
Also, I don't
think unidirectional mode is suitable for scanning. 


Regards,
        Stef

Reply via email to