On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:18:39AM -0500, Howard Shane wrote: > I would like to announce the completion of the initial draft of the > Scanner-HOWTO for the linux documentation project, and invite > participants on the SANE-devel mailing list to comment on it. > > The goal of this document is to bridge point A (scanner) to point B > (scanner running successfully in linux) for the relative newbie as > efficiently as possible. As such it should not be too technical, it > should cover the most common hardware interface types, the required > steps to reach a working result, likely pitfalls and how to recover from > them, and places to go for help. It is not designed to be an exaustive > list of harware in/compatibilities. > > Any help you can suggest to clarify or otherwise improve the draft will > be greatly appreciated and may even result in you being mentioned in the > credits if you so desire. > > The document can be found at: > > http://ibiblio.org/gferg/ldp/Scanner-HOWTO.html > > _______________________________________________ > Sane-devel mailing list > sane-de...@www.mostang.com > http://www.mostang.com/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Hello, I've parsed it a bit, and I must say that you're painting the picture darker than it really is for parallel port scanners. Parallel port scanners listed in SANE do work. No need to frighten people. I'm a bit skeptic about favouring ECP mode. It may be wise for printers, but I think it is useless for scanners, unless you use some patch that bring DMA reads. From a quick grep in SANE docs, EPP or ECP/EPP seems to be the recommended setting. By the way, an EPP scan is way faster than PS/2 or bidirectional mode. Also, I don't think unidirectional mode is suitable for scanning. Regards, Stef