Hi, On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 06:56:08PM -0500, Dan McGhee wrote: > >I have already looked at Rene's SVN and the patch and there doesn't > >seem to be any relevant change in the above mentioned part of the > >code. > > > > > I'm sorry, but I disagree. The sequence you noted previously is > currently in Rev 282 of the avision backend on SVN. This version is not > patched.
Looks like I looked at the first version of frpatch (28 Aug 2005). You seem to use the second version (Mon, 12 Sep 2005). You are right, that patch seems to fix the oroginal problem. I don't see any oviously fishy code now. Bye, Henning
