Hi, On Sunday 02 October 2005 14:58, Luke Kendall wrote: > I took the snapshots from http://www.sane-project.org/snapshots/ > which were: > sane-backends-2005-10-02.tar.gz > sane-frontends-2005-10-02.tar.gz > > I also grabbed libusb-0.1.10a.tar.gz from sourceforge and isnatlled > that. Though it installs as 0.1, which seems a strange numbering > scheme:
[SNIPSNAP] > I then had a look for Stephan February's changes (in his post of Sept > 29), but it looks like they didn't make it into the Oct2 2nd snapshots? > > So I applied the changes manually to backend/plustek-usbdevs.c. > > I was surprised that a "make" didn't compile anything. I then looked > through the output from make and saw that plustek-usbdevs.c had never > been compiled in the first place. > > So I think I'm a bit out of my depth now, since I don't understand how > plustek-usbdevs.c gets compiled (it only appears in the DISTFILES list). > > In the end I gave up and made clean and rebuilt everything, but I still > didn't notice plustek-usbdevs.c get compiled. as mentioned before, touch backend/plustek.c, then the stuff gets compiled. all other plustek-usb*.c files will be included by plustek.c - not nice, but it works. Anyway Stephans' changes are now in CVS. Ciao, Gerhard