Hi, sorry for the delay.
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 10:36, Jose Paulo Moitinho de Almeida wrote: > > Using the version in the package (build 182) I had problems that seemed > > very similar to your log, but with a (much) older version (build 99) I > > could a scan without problems. From files that I found laying around I > > would say that build 153 was also working. > > > > In any case I promise to try a more rigorous test later on. > > Yesterday I tested several versions and I think that at least one of the > problems has to do with the calibration method, when the backend chooses > between "one command" or "send data channel by channel". The driver is > using the second and hangs. I forced the driver to use the first method and > it seems to work. > > Rene, if you please check in the correct voodoo (AV_ONE_CALIB_CMD or > AV_MULTI_CALIB_CMD or ...) I can check more thoroughly how the code > behaves. The device already contains some comments that it might be neded, look at this: { "MINOLTA", "FS-V1", 0x0638, 0x026a, "Minolta", "Dimage Scan Dual II", AV_FILMSCANNER}, /* maybe AV_ONE_CALIB_CMD */ /* comment="1 pass, film-scanner" */ /* status="good" */ Can you try if you make the line: AV_FILMSCANNER | AV_ONE_CALIB_CMD Can you also please send me a log with calibration with SANE_DEBUG_AVISION=7 ? Yours, -- Ren? Rebe - Rubensstr. 64 - 12157 Berlin (Europe / Germany) http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rebe.name +49 (0)30 / 255 897 45