Hi,

> But back to the problem I have/had with Etienne's suggstion for the
> "relations" between page size and scan window coordinates: It does
> not make much sense to allow to set a scan window in overscan mode:
> The backend should calculate the scan window settings automatically
> from the page size, and disable the options tl-x, tl-y, br-x, br-y.

No ! If a user want to scan only a portion of the paper, he must be able
to set scan area, but as long as there is no scan surface, we use paper
size as scan surface. That make sense !

?tienne.
-- 
Verso l'Alto !
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
        =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20070122/14116d8f/attachment.pgp
From kitno...@gmail.com  Mon Jan 22 14:43:25 2007
From: kitno...@gmail.com (m. allan noah)
Date: Mon Jan 22 14:50:42 2007
Subject: [sane-devel] Well known option consensus
In-Reply-To: <1169466263.5734.1.camel@thilivren>
References: <1169400182.5609.23.camel@thilivren> <45b4083a.7070...@gmx.net>
        <97246d0e0701211646s24e11ee5o7f0e2e397b45e...@mail.gmail.com>
        <45b41a2c.9000...@gmx.net> <1169466263.5734.1.camel@thilivren>
Message-ID: <97246d0e0701220543t16978099jed1efc3934e0b...@mail.gmail.com>

On 1/22/07, ?tienne Bersac <bersac...@laposte.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > But back to the problem I have/had with Etienne's suggstion for the
> > "relations" between page size and scan window coordinates: It does
> > not make much sense to allow to set a scan window in overscan mode:
> > The backend should calculate the scan window settings automatically
> > from the page size, and disable the options tl-x, tl-y, br-x, br-y.
>
> No ! If a user want to scan only a portion of the paper, he must be able
> to set scan area, but as long as there is no scan surface, we use paper
> size as scan surface. That make sense !

you missed the point here. we are talking about an overscan option, which
causes the scanner to add space all around the scan, such that the back-
ground shows thru.

but i think a person might want to overscan and still have only a
small area of the page (one of the corners?) i think i can work this
out, and still be compatible with the text of our suggestion.

allan

-- 
"The truth is an offense, but not a sin"

Reply via email to