Is this a conflict? I have *NAME: Microtek ScanMaker 4900 TYPE: MRS-2400L48U USB ID: 05da:30d9*
However, in unsuported.desc the entry for 4900 has different USB code (b instead of d in 30b9). that is : :model "ScanMaker 4900" :url "/unsupported/microtek-scanmaker-4900.html" :interface "USB" :usbid "0x05da" "0x30b9" :status :unsupported :comment "Unsupported. See link for more details." on the other hand entry for the 4850 has the right code :model "ScanMaker 4850" :url "/unsupported/microtek-scanmaker-4900.html" :interface "USB" :usbid "0x05da" "0x30d9" :status :unsupported :comment "Probably unsupported. See link for details." Could it be a typo? "b" and "d" seem to look similar. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20071125/cb74430e/attachment.htm
