On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:44:31 +0100 Julien BLACHE <jb at jblache.org> wrote:
> > we could, but every answer will be different or, at least, slightly > > different. > > Then, we can't answer it. As long as what you wrote will hold, then it > means we can't answer that (rather crucial) question. > > > if we answer, who will take the burden of actually choice > > a single answer? > > Everybody interested in SANE will take the burden of developing it > further. But that requires a rough form of consensus first. Yes, and given we have not reached it in years, I'm not so confident that we would be able to do it now. I think we have a split situation in which each "side" has probably some 50% . And I don't really have an answer on how to solve that. -- Best regards, Alessandro Zummo, Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy http://www.towertech.it
