"m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Jim Meyering <jim at meyering.net> wrote: >> Peter Kirchgessner <peter at kirchgessner.net> wrote: >> > I have no problem if the usleep(1000) is added. If it helps, it's >> > ok. For a typical scan about 200 inquiries are done. So setting up the >> > scanner is slowed down by 0.2 seconds in total. That is far less than >> > the scan will need. >> > I don't know if it is possible with libusb to check if an answer of >> > the scanner is available or not. But if you tried increasing the value >> > and it still did not work every second run I would say there are still >> > some other problems with USB. My ScanJet 6250 is working without >> > problems for years using USB. >> >> Thanks for looking at it. >> Maybe we have different hardware, in spite of the >> identical model numbers. Mine is 9 or 10 years old. >> I don't recall if I ever updated the driver. >> Do you know which you have? >> >> >> > Who will apply the patch to the official SANE-backends ? >> >> Who do we prod? ;-) > > i will do it now. however, there still seem to be some issues for me,
Thanks. > so i might find some time to play with it in the next few weeks, and > produce another patch. would you be willing to test that? Sure.