Rene Rebe <rene at exactcode.de> wrote: > The TWAIN standard is open, and here is the link: > > http://twain.org/docs/TWAIN19.pdf
Back in the days, ISTR it wasn't open. I'll try to find some time to go through it. > Actually the capabilities are even quite similar. That's what makes the most sense I think, so it's no surprise. > In retrospect I wonder why TWAIN was not used when SANE was > started for the open / free OSs. Maybe just to do it differently than > on Windows and the Mac. NIH syndrom? :) I wasn't here back then, but my feeling about TWAIN at that time (was fiddling with a handheld scanner on Windows 3.11) was that it was something really complicated, so I can understand why SANE came out as something simpler. These days, we may not see TWAIN as something as complicated as we used to think back then because we're now used to similar designs all over the place (and the cost of such designs in terms of code and runtime performance is quite smaller these days, too). Well, OK, enough random thoughts ;) JB. -- Julien BLACHE <http://www.jblache.org> <jb at jblache.org> GPG KeyID 0xF5D65169