Sorry, should have gone to the list: On Feb 18, 2008 4:05 AM, m. allan noah <kitno455 at gmail.com> wrote: > nicolas- please dont remove the lines from canon-mfp.desc, if that > external backend still supports those machines. it is ok to have the > same machines listed in two different desc files. > > allan > > On 2/17/08, Nicolas Martin <nicols-guest at alioth.debian.org> wrote: > > Date: Sunday, February 17, 2008 @ 15:49:43 > > Author: nicols-guest > > Path: /cvsroot/sane/sane-backends > > > > Modified: ChangeLog backend/pixma.c backend/pixma.h backend/pixma_common.c > > backend/pixma_io_sanei.c backend/pixma_mp150.c > > backend/pixma_mp730.c backend/pixma_mp750.c > > doc/descriptions-external/canon_mfp.desc > > doc/descriptions/pixma.desc doc/sane-pixma.man > > > > New models changes: > > - added: Pixma MP210, MP470, MP520, MP610 > > - added: MultiPASS MP710 > > - declared untested: MP140, MP220, MultiPASS MP740 > > - declared experimental and untested: MP970 > > Bugs and fixes > > - multipage documents scan no more fails with non-ADF MPs > > - IO Fail bug when scanning large pages e.g. with Xsane > > - implement send_time message form MP710, MP730 family > > - run indent -gnu on all pixma_* source files.
Just to chime in here: Nicolas, the MP710 is a PIXMA device, and the type with extra fax support is the MP740. I am not sure what the untested MultiPASS MP740 is, but you could add the PIXMA MP740 there too I think. Regards, Gernot
