On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 14:01:15 +0100 Rainer Dorsch <rdorsch at web.de> wrote:
> I was not aware that there is an epson2 backend, thanks for pointing that > out. > You are right, twelve pixels rows are missing in the final result compared to > the epson2 backend prediction. I try to play with the y parameter this > afternoon. I would be surprised though if that would be the problem since the > 300 dpi scan does work. Maybe there's an unspotted error somewhere, the perfection 610 is a tricky scanner and there are some sections of the driver dedicated to its handling. However, I was unable to test it personally since I do not own such a scanner. If you search for "color shuffle" in the code you'll see that the scan area gets modified for the 610 because the color shuffling algorithm will eat some data. For such a scanner, I'd suggest to scan a bigger area and then refine by software. -- Best regards, Alessandro Zummo, Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy http://www.towertech.it
