@ 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410366&aid=312616&group_id=30186
 

I said: 

"I am new to linux scanning, but have looked at the work being done for CANON 
imageclass MF6550 for a year or so. The backends releasd with Ubuntu 10.4 seems 
to be "almost" there. 

Using the XSANE frontend, for example, The scanner model is properly 
identified, and the GUI allows me to request a regular scan or preview scan. 

SYMPTOM: When a (flatbed) scan is initiated, the scan head appears to make a 
registration move, then makes a full 14 inch pass of the scanning bed, and then 
returns to its home position. 

The UBUNTU system "locks" as though it is waiting for a data transfer handshake 
that never happens. No image is returned. This is good for ONE attempt. 
subsequent attempts to scan result in error messages. Disconnecting and 
reconnecting the scanner from the system is not sufficient to "clear" the hang. 
The ubuntu system must be reset. 

So, I am able to recognize the scanner, activate one pass of the scan head, and 
then nothing. I tried this initially under 10.4 (32 bit) and after migrating my 
systems to 64 bit repeated the test with the same result. 

I see that the scanner project wants testers for this model of scanner. I would 
be happy to help, but I will need some hints (e.g. where log files might be 
created. What command I should use to see sane process status, a command line 
option that would isolate and test the backend before we bring in GUI frontends 
to the mix.) 

Ron " 

PS 

Following advice by Nicholas, I am submitting this to the DEV list, building an 
ubuntu library from the "git', and will try to capture some test results this 
evening. 


cd /usr/src 
git clone git://git.debian.org/sane/sane-backends.git 
cd sane-backends 
apt-get install libusb-dev 
./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var 
make 
make install 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20100630/9fb02182/attachment.htm>

Reply via email to