The thing is, it IS listed in the supported devices list! That's why I bought it.
sane-find-scanner gives its chip as GL848+ though the list says it's a GL124+. There is no source file gl848.c as there are for GL124, GL647 etc. I have a feeling that Canon have a history of breaking compatibility while keeping the same USB product ID. I have exactly the same result as previous posters. Identical lsusb -v except for the additional line 'Couldn't open device, some information will be missing'. Is that likely to be a real problem? Is there any mileage in faking the device to appear to be a LiDE 200 using the GL847? That could give at least partial compatibility? If so, suggestions gratefully received on anything to change apart from the array entry in genesys_usb_device_list. Thanks in advance. Who should I contact to get the supported deviced updated, if the problem is as it appears? -- View this message in context: http://sane.10972.n7.nabble.com/Canon-LiDE-220-tp18977p20697.html Sent from the SANE - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
