I agree with Jeremias. If there was maintenance to be done, it could have been branched.

Craig

On Nov 18, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:

Charles,

Why exactly did you revert the package renaming? If it's just for doing
a maintenance release with the old package structure, a branch would
have been better. In the end it has to be org.apache.sanselan.

Jeremias Maerki



On 17.11.2007 22:58:40 cmchen wrote:
Author: cmchen
Date: Sat Nov 17 13:58:22 2007
New Revision: 596008

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=596008&view=rev
Log:
restored original package structure (from org.apache.sanselan.* -> org.cmc.sanselan.*).
<snip/>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to