Hi Craig, I've updated the names. Let me know if that's not what you had in mind.
http://people.apache.org/~cmchen/dist/incubator/sanselan/0.93/ Charles. On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I looked at the signatures and md5 checksums for the four artifacts and they > look good. > > But the artifacts do need to have -incubating in their file names. It's not > sufficient to have incubator in the path name since once you download the > files they lose their path. > > I didn't look inside the artifacts, but trust others will have done so. > > So, -1 based on the file names. If these get fixed, +1 > > Craig > > On Jul 22, 2008, at 7:25 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > >> Great! >> >> I'll try to have a look at the dist today. >> >> Thanks >> Carsten >> >> Charles Matthew Chen wrote: >>> >>> Hello there, >>> I've reorganized the proposed 0.93 release of Sanselan following >>> Craig's suggestions. Let's put this release to a vote. >>> The proposed release can be found here: >>> http://people.apache.org/~cmchen/dist/ >>> Here's a summary of the reorganization that I've just done: >>> * I've reorganized the folder structure so that it exactly matches >>> what would be copied to www.apache.org/dist. >>> * I've renamed the folders and files to conform with Apache customs. >>> ie. the I renamed the -project files to -src. I also removed the >>> -incubator suffix from the files. >>> * I've removed the extra checksum files generated by Maven. >>> * Maven generated both a -bin distribution as well as a plain .jar. >>> I've removed the plain jar. >>> * I've removed the bz2-compressed distributions generated by Maven. >>> Also, I've attached the RAT output for the bin and src releases. >>> RAT seems a little wary of the .txt and text-like (ie. .ppm) files in >>> the source distribution. >>> Apache's "A Guide To Release Management During Incubation" (DRAFT) >>> has a checklist: >>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list >>> I believe everything on that checklist is good to go. >>> For the record, here's a couple more relevant links on release voting: >>> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote >>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >>> Charles. >> >> >> -- >> Carsten Ziegeler >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Craig L Russell > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > >
