I would also be interested to see this, I was about to embark on building a new fedex shipping module using the SOAP api as I'm building a store that needs full fedex functionality (ground, express, and international + generating shipping labels)
Hopefully your boss will let you release it :) Otherwise, I'll build my own and submit it back to satchmo... either way, just let me know Thanks, Tom On Jul 22, 8:24 am, Chris Laux <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7/21/2010 6:43 PM, Chris Moffitt wrote:> I imagine the issues are still > there. I don't think the module has > > been touched in a while. The good news is that I doubt the issues are > > that huge to resolve - mostly templating I suspect. > > > The problem with these modules is that it's hard to test and keep up > > with if you're not actively using them (and I'm not at this time.) > > > Anyway, any patches or fixes would be appreciated and incorporated. > > > -Chris > > I rewrote the Fedex shipping module to use their newer SOAP API. I was > having quite a few problems with the included one (don't remember the > issues now) so I called their support line. After a good bit of > confusion due to Satchmo using an older API, the tech guy told me that > this older API is deprecated and will be turned off in about 2 years. In > the end, I decided to just rewrite it. > > I'd be happy to contribute this code back to Satchmo, but: > > * I make no claim that the code is good (I copied the current module > & hacked it up) > * it has a few site-specific hacks in it > * it requires the suds SOAP module > * I need to clear it with my boss first ;) > > Let me know if you're interested and I'll see if I can put a tar up > somewhere. I don't have much free time to maintain it if something > breaks, though. > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:19 PM, flowpoke <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > Howdy, > > > I've experienced some issues with the FedEx shipping module and > > sending to international addresses. > > > I also found some threads here (2008, 2009) in the group that explain > > it's due to the state field and response. > > > Is this still the case? I suppose I better jump in and help as this is > > pretty important to have working. > > > Anyone else working on this? > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Satchmo users" group. > > To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] > > <mailto:satchmo-users%[email protected]>. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Satchmo users" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en. > > -- > Chris Laux -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Satchmo users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en.
