Yeah, looks like you are right. I think I normally used that 'display-name option' that Graham mentioned. Sorry about the confusion there. If you use that, then do they show up in ps?
Alex On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Josh <[email protected]> wrote: > I also noticed that down near the bottom of this thread > http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi/browse_thread/thread/9d0e72b2cd3a833a/ef021fcca0871c77 > Graham Dumpleton said that "Under 'top' or 'ps', the mod_wsgi daemon > process will still show as a apache/httpd process." So I think it all > gets lumped together. > > On Nov 11, 12:38 pm, Josh <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hmm, i don't think I'm actually seeing the daemons. What do they show >> up as under COMMAND (I dont see anything with wsgi). But there is >> another small dev site running on the same server (they are both >> theoretically set up under daemon mode as I showed above). I think >> that if it wasn't in daemon mode they wouldn't both work although I >> could be wrong about that. Looking at the apache conf I posted >> earlier does it seem that I have properly configured daemon mode? >> Thanks. >> >> On Nov 11, 12:22 pm, Alex Robbins <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > If you are really running mod_wsgi in daemon mode, then django and >> > satchmo won't be able to affect the size of the httpd processes. The >> > python interpreter should live in the mod_wsgi daemon, which is a >> > completely separate process. I have had troubles before with mod_wsgi >> > running in embedded mode, even though it is supposed to be daemon. Can >> > you see any processes for mod_wsgi? If you don't get the config >> > exactly right, it won't use daemon mode. (This might not even be the >> > problem, but if there aren't daemon processes something is >> > misconfigured.) >> >> > If you can see the daemon processes, and httpd is separate and huge, >> > then I'm not sure what is going on. It wouldn't be python making it >> > big. Maybe there are some other modules installed? (mod_php, mod_rails >> > or something like that?) >> >> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Josh <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > Ok so the server is a VPS and it uses virtualmin and centos. My >> > > understanding is that each domain has its own httpd process (two if >> > > you have ssl enabled). I have been watching the output of top for >> > > awhile and when I say memory usage I am talking about the virt of a >> > > specific httpd process. I am fairly certain that this is the httpd >> > > process which the site runs from because it is the correct user and as >> > > I opened multiple connections the memory usage began going up. This >> > > single httpd process now is up to 867m virt and 651m res. There are >> > > other things on the system using memory but they have remained >> > > constant and I am concerned that a single process has gone up so much >> > > when it seems that nothing is going on with the site. Thanks for the >> > > help. >> >> > > On Nov 11, 11:53 am, Alex Robbins <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > >> First off, mod_wsgi in daemon mode with apache should be a decent >> > >> deployment method for ram consumption. I don't think your problem is >> > >> there. >> >> > >> When you say the memory usage is 650mb, what is actually using all >> > >> that memory? Is it httpd processes? The mod_wsgi processes? >> >> > >> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Josh <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Oh yeah my urls looks like this: >> >> > >> > from django.conf.urls.defaults import * >> > >> > from store.urls import urlpatterns >> >> > >> > urlpatterns += patterns('', >> > >> > ('^pages/', include('django.contrib.flatpages.urls')), >> > >> > (r'^product_info\.php', 'store.localsite.views.old_redirect'), >> > >> > (r'^searchRedirect/', 'store.localsite.views.redirect_search'), >> > >> > (r'^reports/', 'store.localsite.views.reports.view'), >> > >> > ) >> >> > >> > and I have local_dev and debug set to false. (searchRedirect and the >> > >> > product_info\.php above were set up to redirect because the site used >> > >> > to be osCommerce based). >> >> > >> > On Nov 11, 11:46 am, Josh <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> It is centos but we are using apache and mod_wsgi in daemon mode, >> > >> >> here >> > >> >> is the relevant part of my apache conf: >> > >> >> ------- >> >> > >> >> Alias /static/ /home/hatikva/store/static/ >> >> > >> >> <Directory /home/hatikva/store/static> >> > >> >> Order deny,allow >> > >> >> Allow from all >> > >> >> </Directory> >> >> > >> >> Alias /media/ /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/contrib/ >> > >> >> admin/media/ >> >> > >> >> <Directory >> > >> >> /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/contrib/admin/ >> > >> >> media> >> > >> >> Order deny,allow >> > >> >> Allow from all >> > >> >> </Directory> >> >> > >> >> WSGIDaemonProcess hatikva.com user=hatikva group=hatikva >> > >> >> python-path=/ >> > >> >> usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages >> > >> >> WSGIProcessGroup hatikva.com >> > >> >> WSGIScriptAlias / /home/hatikva/store/apache/store.wsgi >> >> > >> >> ------- >> >> > >> >> My understanding is that the way the static directory is set up above >> > >> >> means that apache and not django serves media. >> >> > >> >> As I have watched the memory usage has continued to go up, its now at >> > >> >> ~650m, up from ~220m (I have stopped refreshing and this has happened >> > >> >> in the past 20 minutes or so). >> >> > >> >> I am open to recommendations as to a better setup (which I may or may >> > >> >> not be able to do depending on the person I have made the site for). >> > >> >> Thanks for the quick response! >> >> > >> >> -Josh >> >> > >> >> On Nov 11, 11:39 am, Laszlo Antal <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > Could you check to make sure django does not serve static media? >> > >> >> > I had a very similar issue (4000+ products) and I left by accident >> > >> >> > the static_serve in urls.py >> > >> >> > Just a thought >> >> > >> >> > lzantal >> >> > >> >> > On Nov 11, 2010, at 11:30, Josh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > I have been working on a satchmo site with ~3000 products that >> > >> >> > > has >> > >> >> > > repeatedly over the past week or so crashed the server it is >> > >> >> > > running. >> > >> >> > > It is on a VPS with 2G dedicated ram. It seems that once the >> > >> >> > > httpd >> > >> >> > > process allocates memory it never releases it, eventually taking >> > >> >> > > all >> > >> >> > > available memory and crashing the server. I tried opening about >> > >> >> > > ten >> > >> >> > > pages from the site and repeatedly hard refreshed them and >> > >> >> > > watched the >> > >> >> > > memory usage (via top) shoot up more than 150m in about 10 >> > >> >> > > minutes, >> > >> >> > > its still going up as I write this. >> >> > >> >> > > Are there any known memory leaks in satchmo? Why would memory >> > >> >> > > usage >> > >> >> > > continue to go up after I have stopped hard refreshing? (I >> > >> >> > > guess it >> > >> >> > > is possible that other people are visiting the site but every two >> > >> >> > > second or so it seems to go up about 1m, which if it continues >> > >> >> > > the >> > >> >> > > server will crash again). Thanks in advance for any help. >> >> > >> >> > > -Josh >> >> > >> >> > > -- >> > >> >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the >> > >> >> > > Google Groups "Satchmo users" group. >> > >> >> > > To post to this group, send email to >> > >> >> > > [email protected]. >> > >> >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > >> >> > > [email protected]. >> > >> >> > > For more options, visit this group >> > >> >> > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en. >> >> > >> > -- >> > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > >> > Groups "Satchmo users" group. >> > >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > >> > [email protected]. >> > >> > For more options, visit this group >> > >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en. >> >> > > -- >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > > Groups "Satchmo users" group. >> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > > [email protected]. >> > > For more options, visit this group >> > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en. >> >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Satchmo users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Satchmo users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en.
