Either way will work; it's really just your call. The way Bob Waycott shows (i.e. inheritance) is technically 'better' (according to my taste anyway), but it's slightly less documented. The 'legacy' way (i.e. one-to-one field) is a bit... well, legacy, but it is well-documented and therefore perhaps a bit easier. I don't really know what else to say about it -- I don't reckon that one way is really any more 'correct' than the other. Both ways are pretty quick to implement; you might even branch your code, do it both ways, and see which you prefer...?
--Stuart On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:58 AM, Chris Morgan <[email protected]> wrote: > Any chance of an answer for this? I really do want to know what is the > correct way to do it, and whether CustomProduct(Product) will work or not. > > I'd prefer this not to go the way of the similar (covering this and more) > questions I asked on January 29 - "A different slug style, templates and > product sub-type techniques"; I'd still love answers to all of those, too. > > > -- Chris Morgan > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Satchmo users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Satchmo users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en.
