The minimalistic version of uwsgi script above was for debugging purposes: all in one process, log output to screen, no memory limits etc.
For virtualenv is very important the option --home /path/to/home/of/virtualenv Then options can be tested and added one by one to create more realistic configuration. On 8 zář, 23:15, hynekcer <[email protected]> wrote: > Although the Satchmo has some special solutions within the project > (urls, optional modules loading etc.) from outside it is a common > Django application and you can use any guidance for Django. > > A minimalistic configuration specific for uwsgi is > == /etc/nginx/sites-available/yoursite > # usual common static things ... > ... > location / { > # uWSGI server > uwsgi_pass unix:///var/some/path.uwsgi.sock; > include uwsgi_params; > } > ... > > == project-startup-script-uwsgi > #!/bin/bash > uwsgi \ > --pythonpath /var/yourprojectsdirectory \ > --env DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE=yourprojectname.settings \ > -w "django.core.handlers.wsgi:WSGIHandler()" \ > -s /var/some/path.uwsgi.sock \ > -C > # I prefer easy option "-C", which means socket is created by uwsgi > with permission 666. I manually restrict permissions of the directory > where it is located. > > On 7 zář, 22:30, wizbit <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I am trying to get satchmo working with nginx + uwsgi. > > > I would very much like to see a nginx.conf and satchmo.wsgi example if > > possible. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Satchmo users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en.
