Haha... to send a mail can sometimes take an hour and to send an email
without address can take a little more. That is really better to do it
on the background... :-)
I am pleased that the work fell off.

On 17 lis, 13:55, Bin Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Problem resolved!
> The problem resides in the code to send the confirmation email!
> Because I use a faked email for the Oauth user(I don't know the
> email), so the satchmo just blocked there for 2 minutes, and this
> problem is random, maybe DNS resovlve timeout or somethign like that?
>
> Anyway thanks all!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Bin Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi hynekcer,
>
> > I diff the database for 2 cases: one for normal registered user, the
> > other one for registered by my program. The difference is the normal
> > registered user has a Contact entry but in my code I didn't new a
> > Contact and save to database.
>
> > Not sure it is the root cause, still testing. I am wondering is it
> > useful for you to resolve the bug that makes the submiting order
> > process timeout?
>
> > Anyway may I suggest in next version satchmo we report error for
> > database inconsistency instead of waiting for timeout?
>
> > And one further question, I don't know where the code resides, can you
> > tell me so maybe I can take a look to try to fix it? The timeout is
> > accurately 2 minutes.
>
> > THANKS.
> > Bin
>
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Bin Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Hi hynekcer,
>
> >> I am using runfcgi, and the command says it doesn't support --noreload 
> >> option.
>
> >> Is it possible to do it with runfcgi? My command:
>
> >> ./manage.py runfcgi method=threaded host=127.0.0.1 port=8801
>
> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Bin Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> Thanks, I will take a look first.
>
> >>> For the issue that the admin interface can't change the status, I
> >>> didn't notice the timeout, maybe I haven't waited long enough for the
> >>> timeout.
>
> >>> FYI, the timeout of the problem I described earlier is precisely 2
> >>> minutes, I can't reproduce them but once I can I will send you the
> >>> trace.
>
> >>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 6:22 AM, hynekcer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> Hi Bin Chen,
> >>>> I wrote a guide how to report timeouts and get a traceback of them. It
> >>>> is written also for you.
> >>>>http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users/browse_thread/thread/89b...
>
> >>>> You wrote
> >>>>> I found some cases several times that the admin interface just
> >>>>> can't change the order status...
>
> >>>> That are also timeouts?
>
> >>>> --Hynek
>
> >>>> On 14 lis, 03:01, Bin Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>> Yes I found some cases several times that the admin interface just
> >>>>> can't change the order status(not related to this one), then I try to
> >>>>> manipulate the database(delete orders, new orders back and force),
> >>>>> finally it resolved... I don't know why.
>
> >>>>> Thanks for your help, next time I will be trying to "diff" the database.
>
> >>>>> This problem is OK now, I didn't do any thing... Maybe it is still the
> >>>>> database's problem.
>
> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:33 AM, hynekcer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>> > Timeout should really be fixed in Satchmo if possible, notably if it
> >>>>> > could be caused by unusual data in the database.
>
> >>>>> > Please, try to find the cause.
> >>>>> > What does automatically created user with manual login? Does it fail
> >>>>> > exactly on the last step of checkout - confirm?
>
> >>>>> > Try to restart python between loging and checkout. This eliminates all
> >>>>> > possible causes related to theadlocals.
>
> >>>>> > If I would you, I would first export the database to SQL before and
> >>>>> > after manual/automatic registration and to "diff" them.
>
> >>>>> > On 14 lis, 01:31, Bin Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>> >> Thanks hynekcer, I will take a look. I found the submit process is
> >>>>> >> "waiting for something to timeout", if I click the confirm button the
> >>>>> >> page just stuck and finally got Gateway timeout, but after 1 minute
> >>>>> >> the order status can be changed to New successfully. So I guess the
> >>>>> >> order processing logic is waiting for some signal or something? Any
> >>>>> >> idea for which file I should look into? I think the problem resides 
> >>>>> >> in
> >>>>> >> confirm order -> change order to New.
>
> >>>>> >> With the account which is registered by human in Satchmo, it is OK
> >>>>> >> without any problems.
>
> >>>>> >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:18 AM, hynekcer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>> >> > Satchmo uses "threaded_multihost.middleware.ThreadLocalMiddleware".
> >>>>> >> > Verify if there is any code related to it around login.
>
> >>>>> >> > On 13 lis, 04:12, Bin Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>> >> >> I am using Satchmo 9.2, and I have developed some code to login 
> >>>>> >> >> user
> >>>>> >> >> using a twitter like website's oauth system. My code to create the
> >>>>> >> >> user:
>
> >>>>> >> >>         if user == None:
> >>>>> >> >>         user = User.objects.create_user(username=uu,
> >>>>> >> >>                 email=uu,
> >>>>> >> >>                 password=password)
> >>>>> >> >>         user.first_name = username
> >>>>> >> >>         user.save()
>
> >>>>> >> >> And I login user by:
>
> >>>>> >> >> user = authenticate(username=uu, password=password)
> >>>>> >> >> if user is not None:
> >>>>> >> >>     if user.is_active:
> >>>>> >> >>         login(request, user)
> >>>>> >> >>         # Redirect to a success page.
> >>>>> >> >>     else:
> >>>>> >> >>         pass
>
> >>>>> >> >> Everything works fine but if I use this auto-generated user to 
> >>>>> >> >> make
> >>>>> >> >> the order, the order submit page just stuck. I don't know if I am
> >>>>> >> >> missing something? Please suggest, thanks!!
>
> >>>>> >> > --
> >>>>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >>>>> >> > Groups "Satchmo users" group.
> >>>>> >> > To post to this group, send email to 
> >>>>> >> > [email protected].
> >>>>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >>>>> >> > [email protected].
> >>>>> >> > For more options, visit this group 
> >>>>> >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en.
>
> >>>>> > --
> >>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >>>>> > Groups "Satchmo users" group.
> >>>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >>>>> > [email protected].
> >>>>> > For more options, visit this group 
> >>>>> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en.
>
> >>>> --
> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >>>> Groups "Satchmo users" group.
> >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >>>> [email protected].
> >>>> For more options, visit this group 
> >>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Satchmo users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to