Thanks for replying, and yes authorize.net has so many API methods it's
difficult to know how to proceed. I forgot to mention:
'x_device_type':'8', #8 ==website
'x_market_type':'2', #2 ==Retail
'x_response_format': '1', #1== delimited response, default is
0==XML
I don't understand why the API 1 would require and 2 would not. In any
event, including them in my trans['configuration'] dictionary eliminated
my error message.
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 6:56 PM, hynekcer <[email protected]> wrote:
> It looks that you compare different API and documents for different
> authorize.net services CP/CNP [1] [2]
> The second one should be implemented in Satchmo or it looks very
> similar. (I do not know authoruze.net, can't say more.)
> Autorize.net supports now so many methods [3] that I can not guess the
> right.
>
> [1] http://www.authorize.net/support/CP_guide.pdf
> [2] http://www.authorize.net/support/ARB_guide.pdf
> [3] http://developer.authorize.net/api/
>
> -- Hynek
>
> On 10 bře, 23:24, Mac <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm relatively new at programming, and I'm not sure whether the fix
> > below is correct or not. The problem was I kept getting errors when I
> > submitted a test transaction to the authorize.net url.
> >
> > When I went to process a test transaction in Satchmo, I received an
> > error that said my market type was not valid for this transaction. I
> > looked at the processor.py code and found that under the function def
> > get_standard_charge_data (this is the particular function for my test
> > transaction), for the trans['configuration'] dictionary, the following
> > key:value pairs were missing:
> >
> > 'x_device_type':'8',
> > 'x_market_type':'2',
> > 'x_response_format': '1',
> >
> > Under the authorize.net API, I believe these key:value pairs are
> > required; otherwise, you'll fail the test. I'm no expert, but I think
> > we need to add these to the other functions in processor.py too. Once
> > I added them to the dictionary in the code for this particular
> > function in processor.py, I now get a response code 1, which means the
> > test transaction is approved, and all is well as far as the test is
> > concerned.
> >
> > My question is has anyone else experienced this problem or a similar
> > one? Can someone update authorize.net processor.py to include the
> > above key:value pairs?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Satchmo users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Satchmo users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en.
