Mathieu Roy wrote: > > I may be willing to hunt for unclosed tags (like `<input ...>') etc. > > If you do, it may be more convenient that you directly commit your > bugfixes on the CVS. Are you interested?
I wrote: > I prefer to have patched reviewed by experienced people in all cases. > But if you really think it is safe, you can give me write permission. > I will then only commit very simple patches, like this. In case I > ever come up with anything more intelligent, I'll post it on the list > instead. However, you are probably right. The changes are going to be very similar and boring. So far most frequent noticed error: * Non-closed tags (<input ...> instead of <input ... />.) * Upper-case tags and attributes (XML is case-sensitive, right?) * Wrong attribute name: <input maxlen="..." ... /> instead of <input maxlength="..." ... /> There are more, but I'd like to have it a little bit cleaned so that we can reduce the number of errors W3C checker prints to a reasonable number. How can I test pages with fixes applied? Do I have to locally install Savane or are CVS sources systematically used at Gna!? Paul _______________________________________________ Savane-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/savane-dev
