Le Samedi 4 Février 2006 11:36, Tobias Toedter a écrit :
> On Saturday 04 February 2006 11:20, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> > Le Samedi 4 Février 2006 11:14, Tobias Toedter a écrit :
> > > Added support for *word* -> <strong>word</strong>
> >
> > Could it use <span class="bold"> and similar classes used in base.css?
> > It gives more latitude to themes authors and make the overal more
> > consistent.
>
> I would like to use the logical markup, i.e. <strong> instead of <span>.
> With <span>, we only provide optical markup, while we provide real context
> with <strong>. This is important when we want to have an accessible site,
> i.e. for handicapped users.
Do software of impaired users ignore CSS?
Can we have <strong class="bold"> instead?
> Moreover, nothing hinders theme authors the use the <strong> tag for their
> markup purposes.
It is inside base.css so it's just an implicit option.
> If you want to enable them to select a special markup for
> those wiki-like formattings, I suggest to use a special class for those
> tags, like <strong class="wiki">. This way, every author can specifically
> markup the tags in the wiki, while still offering good accessibility. If
> the CSS defines no special class "wiki" for <strong>, it's just marked up
> like the rest of the page.
Hum, I do not really want to make a difference between wiki bold and non-wiki
bold.
Or maybe we should just replace
.bold { } by strong {}
.italic { } by em { }
and replace <span class="bold"> and <font class="fold"> (etc) by <strong>
(etc)
That's maybe the cleanest way to do it.
--
Mathieu Roy
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| General Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org/ |
| Computing Homepage: http://alberich.coleumes.org/ |
| Not a native english speaker: |
| http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
