-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 24 Sep 2004 07:55, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> Elfyn McBratney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tapota :
> > Hello Matteo,
> >
> > On Wednesday 22 Sep 2004 18:27, Matteo Settenvini wrote:
> >> I think that for the layout you're right, but for indenting the text per
> >> cent values aren't the best thing you can think of.
> >>
> >> If you think that:
> >>
> >> p {
> >> text-indent : 1%;
> >> }
> >>
> >> is good...
> >
> > Sorry, percent wasn't a good example.. What I said about relativity, is
> > more to the point: try and use relative sizes for fonts, boxes, tables,
> > etc, with their respective keywords (em, pica, pixel|px, point|pt, etc).
> >
> > Of course some absolute sizes are needed (to work around bugs and better
> > support more browsers, ...) for the layout (or 'skeleton') of the page,
> > though. :-)
>
> Hum, if you use pixel, you do not use a relative sizes.
Ja, I kinda mashed that reply up, too.. Sorry.. Best ignore me here ;-)
- --
Elfyn McBratney
beu on irc.freenode.net/savannah.[non]gnu.org
PGP Key ID: 0x456548B4
PGP Key Fingerprint:
29D5 91BB 8748 7CC9 650F 31FE 6888 0C2A 4565 48B4
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBU9JgaIgMKkVlSLQRAikIAKCk3RcEELI+ZdzKKtzViyzkrlPDuACfeAgk
+GaBW4BhNIavBktcoR/mt44=
=peMM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
