Elfyn McBratney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tapota : > Hey, > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 11:11:15PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: >> Elfyn McBratney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tapota : >> >> > Hello Mathieu, >> > >> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 07:28:04AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: >> >> Elfyn McBratney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tapota : >> >> >> >> > Hello, >> >> > >> >> > Would there be any interest in adding table indexes to the Savane >> >> > database? This could bring a noticable performance increase on certain >> >> > queries for large databases (like Savannah's). >> >> > >> >> > If there is interest, I can write up a more in-depth proposal with some >> >> > actual figures and example indexes. >> >> >> >> It's indeed interesting. If you can and want to do it, feel free to >> >> make so. >> > >> > I can and want to. :) >> > >> >> SQL improvements must be added within the files in sql/mysql + in >> >> update/relnumber >> > >> > Should this be done on a branch, or done on HEAD? (I'm thinking the >> > prior, but I want to be sure.) >> >> I'm not sure about the actual impact of the whole thing. If it is just >> an improvement without any risk, it could be done on HEAD. If it can >> broke the whole stuff, then it has to go on a branch. >> >> More generally: HEAD = minor improvements, bugfixes. Branches = >> everything else. > > I don't forsee any breakage. Worst case scenario, I commit a typo, and > the build breaks. ;) > > I'm easy which ever way we go this (branch or HEAD).
If I were you, I would commit on the HEAD, since there's no risk to end up with a difficult-to-recover-something-working situation. Regards, -- Mathieu Roy +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | General Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org/ | | Computing Homepage: http://alberich.coleumes.org/ | | Not a native english speaker: | | http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
