This mail is an automated notification from the bugs tracker
of the project: Savane.
/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #347] Latest Modifications:
Changes by:
Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
'Date:
sam 24.04.2004 à 14:41 (Europe/Paris)
What | Removed | Added
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Planned Release | | 1.0.3
------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
I guess it means saving msg-id in the database and passing it as extra header
to mail(). Why not.
Would it be best to add In-Reply-To in reference of the original bug or of the
latest comment?
/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #347] Full Item Snapshot:
URL: <http://gna.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=347>
Project: Savane
Submitted by: 0
On: sam 24.04.2004 à 13:23
Category: Web Frontend
Severity: 1 - Trivial
Priority: C - Normal
Resolution: None
Assigned to: None
Status: Open
Release:
Planned Release: 1.0.3
Summary: Threaded mailed bug reports
Original Submission: It would be nice if followups to a bug report had their
In-Reply-To header set to the Message-Id of the original bug, report, so that
all related mails appear in the same thread.
See also: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=8675
Commentaires :
------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: sam 24.04.2004 à 14:41 By: yeupou
I guess it means saving msg-id in the database and passing it as extra header
to mail(). Why not.
Would it be best to add In-Reply-To in reference of the original bug or of the
latest comment?
CC List
-------
CC Address | Comment
------------------------------------+-----------------------------
cedricduval+savannah --À-- free --POINT-- fr | original bug submitter
For detailed info, follow this link:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=347>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/