??changed: -A word of warning: try not to compare !VCSs using the stats provided here: first, they are partial (only HTTP), and second, each VCS has its own usage pattern, repository viewers may or may not be hidden from search engines, HTTP may or may not be used as the common transfer protocol, data may be more or less efficiency transmitted, etc. However it's fine to analyse the evolution of one VCS on its own. A word of warning: try not to compare !VCSs using the stats provided here: first, they are partial (only HTTP), and second, each VCS has its own usage pattern, repository viewers may or may not be hidden from search engines, HTTP may or may not be used as the common transfer protocol, etc. However it's fine to analyse the evolution of one VCS on its own.
-- forwarded from https://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/stats#msg20090111172423+0...@https://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance _______________________________________________ Savannah-cvs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-cvs
