??changed: - Your license should be compatible with the GNU GPL, current version or later. Exception: Affero GPL. Your license should be compatible with the GNU GPL, current version or later. (This includes LGPL*-only, since all LGPL versions can be converted to any version of the GPL. Of course, we strongly recommend against using LGPL*-only. And GPL*-only is not acceptable.)
??changed: - These licenses are the ones that the GNU project use for its own projects, and recommend for everybody else to use. They are also the most widespread, and being incompatible with them is a practical problem, because you would then be unable to combine code under those license with yours, and vice versa, even if it is free software. These licenses are the ones that the GNU project uses for its own packages, and recommends for everybody else to use. They are also the most widespread, and being incompatible with them is a practical problem, because you would then be unable to combine code under those license with yours, and vice versa, even if it is free software. --removed: - The Affero GPL is a license prototype, compatible with the current draft of the GNU GPL v3. (Its goal was to deal with the issues with ASPs or Application Service Providers - that is, offering free software legally through a web interface, without giving the freedom to study, modify and share that software to the end user.) - ??changed: - https://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=4303 describes more rational with requiring the GFDL for the manuals' license, and need to be merged here. - - Your project depencies need to be compatible with the license you chose. This is not really a Savannah requirement, but doing otherwise would make your project legally inconsistent, and as such not freely usable. https://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=4303 describes more rationale with respect to requiring the GFDL for the manuals' license (and needs to be merged here). Your project dependencies also need to be compatible with the license you chose. This is not a Savannah-specific requirement, because doing otherwise would make your project legally inconsistent, and as such not freely usable. ??changed: - [email protected], that is, the FSF Licensing Team, may offer suggestions to find the best way to work around a legal issue. - - For non-software, non-documentation works, when we say "free" this refers to http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html . Licenses listed as "free" at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html (whatever the kind of work) are good exemples. [email protected], that is, the FSF Licensing Team, may offer suggestions to find the best way to handle legal issues. For non-software, non-documentation works, when we say "free" this refers to http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html . Licenses listed as "free" at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html (whatever the kind of work) are good examples. -- forwarded from http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/LicensingRequirements#[email protected]/maintenance
