In GSL-Shell, the claims to be distributing Lua source. He made some modifications to the lnum code. The original Lua files point to another lua file which points to the end of it's file to find the license notice for the files. Shall, I tell him to take the notices, from the original file and add it along with his copyright to the files he edited, and leave out the other files? Or would a patch be more reasonable?
Additionally, he claims to need the lua config file customized for his specific environment. I would think he should not distribute those. >From sv-problem-copyright-holder Is the copyright holder referred to in the copyright notices, a legal entity that can be assigned copyright? If not, you need to add the author(s)' name(s) instead. What exactly is meant by "add the author(s)' name(s) instead". I've found some files, which will say something like "By Who Ever". I don't think this is what is meant, so it needs to be a little bit more clear. I have approved some projects without asking whether they were still interested in making savannah their home. Last, time I tried to ask if they were still planning to use savannah, a person sort of got angry with me. -- Nicodemo