marc0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, I've a question. > > There are some little programs (most are elisp programs) that I desire > to put on Savannah, they are small (331 LOC, 93+148 LOC, 262 LOC, 140 > LOC, including comments), but they work and do their job. > > I've already all the web space I need on another great free server > where I can put them on, but I think that using Savannah would expose > them to more users/developers, whith all the good things that come > with this. > > Now, I worry that using Savannah for little programs like these would > be a waste of (Savannah's) resources, but you know this more than me, > so, have you any suggestion?
I think if you asked to setup an elisp repository then that would be a good thing. There would be an admin task associated with doing this because lots of developers would want to submit files but it would be impractical to add all those developers to one project. Therefore someone would have to recieve patches and apply them to the CVS. But if a few people got involved that might be ok. We should also insist on GPG signed patch submissions. So my view is that you should submit an elisp repository project. -- Nic Ferrier http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk _______________________________________________ Savannah-hackers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers
