Hi, I'm evaluating the project you submitted for approval in Savannah.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 08:45:10PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > A package was submitted to savannah.nongnu.org > This mail was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Steve Stites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> described the package as follows: > License: gpl > Other License: > Package: LifeBoat > System name: lifeboat > Type: non-GNU > > Description: > Project Purpose and Summarization : > > I have created a project called LifeBoat. LifeBoat is a script > program which creates rescue CDs on a Linux box. It builds the (This is the second time I said this:) "Linux" is just a kernel of a more complex system that we like to refer to as GNU/Linux, to emphasize the ideals of the Free Software movement. Would you mind changing references to Linux as an OS to GNU/Linux? For more information, see http://www.gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html > LifeBoat > > Copyright (C) 2003 Steve Stites > LifeBoat is released under the GNU General Public > License. See the file called COPYING for a copy of the GNU > General Public License. This isn't the correct way to do it!! Please read my previous mail. > Installation ... the rest isn't needed here ;) > This is my second submission for LifeBoat. I have > corrected everything that Rudy objected to except one thing. Ah ok, can you mail me the updated tarball? > Rudy suggested that I place my documentation under the GFDL. > I read the GFDL and it says that the recipient cannot modify > the documentation. That is not true. > I would hope that anyone who changes the > source code would also change the documentation. So I don't > care for the GFDL as I understand it. Actually I intended > the GPL reference in the documentation to refer to the > source code and not the documentation. If you think I have > my documentation licensing legally scrambled I would be > willing to remove the copyleft clause in the documentation, > or make the documentation public domain, or whatever else > you consider reasonable as long as I don't make the > documentation unchangable. I suggest you reread the GFDL. Other wise I'll help you understand it. Please let me know when sending the updated tarball what you prefer. Rudy -- Rudy Gevaert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web page http://www.webworm.org GNU/Linux for schools http://www.nongnu.org/glms Savannah hacker http://savannah.gnu.org _______________________________________________ Savannah-hackers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers
