Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Nic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> 
> > Damien Genet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 
> > > Le mer 03/09/2003 à 13:18, Nic a écrit :
> > > > We aren't really able to do this without it being signed.
> > > > 
> > > > Can you sign the tar.gz file with your gpg key stored on savannah?
> > > 
> > > Signature attached.
> > > Hope that works, this is my first signature :)
> > 
> > It doesn't appear to be the sig you have on savannah.
> > 
> > Sorry, I can't accept it. I've got to use your key from a trusted
> > source (savannah will do).
> > 
> > Have you still got access to the private key half of the key-pair for
> > which the public key is on savannah?
> 
> Didn't you already received my mails ? I know there a slowdown of the
> internet but it's a bit strange.
> 
> I already unpacked the tarball. The gpg stuff cannot currently be a
> requirement we the structure we have. Basically we make backups and
> do what people ask unless we have doubt about their identity.

It is *REALLY* slow. I did recieve your emails... but they're coming
through very slowly. Mine likewise.



btw I don't think getting people to sign stuff should be a
problem. I've already done it on the one transfer I've done. And
furthermore I think we need to do it less we be put in an
embarrassing position.


Nic



_______________________________________________
Savannah-hackers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers

Reply via email to