Follow-up Comment #5, sr #107417 (project administration):
> Mixing "RFC" and "standard" is a confusion I don't want to spread.
I did not intend to do any such thing. I was only challenging your argument
in comment #1. My point is that the technology is mature and addresses a
pressing need, therefore it should be deployed. "RFC 5746" is simply the most
convenient way I have to refer to the technology; I don't care about the IETF
status of that document.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?107417>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
