Follow-up Comment #36, task #14578 (project administration): > you said "copyright lines are OK" (in the doc/html/README), so > I conclude that I should left the new paragraph I suggested to add > (concerning doxygen licences and output-generated files too). > Is that right?
Not licenses. I was speaking about copyright notices. > I don' t understand "for the license [...] source file" You suggested including this notice: > Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation > under the terms of the GNU General Public License is hereby granted. No representations > are made about the suitability of this software for any purpose. It is provided "as is" > without express or implied warranty. See the GNU General Public License for more details. I tried to point out that the form recommended by the GPL would be better: > This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify > it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or > (at your option) any later version. > > This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > GNU General Public License for more details. > > You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > along with this program. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?14578> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
